Sunday, December 23, 2018
'The Failed Vision\r'
'If I were consulting with the HTE Board of Directors regarding Harolds leadership, from a transformational perspective, I would have fired them that Harold wasnt a total attractor and that his kick in panache was disconfirming to HTE. Harold tried to bring about more a nonher(prenominal) alters to the partnership without recognizing the effects of the changes, which made him seems to hang like he didnt know what he was doing, though his intention was good. His past records were great(p), simply the results from HTE didnt demonstrate what was said about him. His demeanor of leading was in line with the Pseudo-transformational leading.\r\nPseudo-transformational leadership refers to leaders who are self-consumed, exploitive, and power oriented, with falsify moral value (Bass & Riggio,2006). Pseudo-transformational leadership is considered personalized leadership, which focuses on the leaders own bet preferably than on the interest of others (Northouse, 20016 , pg. 163). Harold was more worried about how he looks in position than what is good for the company.\r\nHarold should have focus more on the people and inspire them to make the change he precious a success, barely he didnt reckon them at all in the change process. This was damaging, which finally cause a major(ip) failure and serious loss in revenue to the company.Did Harold have a well-defined passel for HTE? Was he able to apparatus?Yes. Harold did have a clear trance for the company but didnt have the line up method of leadership to make his vision to transform HTE. Harold wanted to prove that newly technologies and advance management could make the company one of the best manufacturing companies in the nation.\r\nHarold created a vision, but it conflicted with his values and management style. It became genuinely(prenominal) difficult for him to convey his vision to the employees in that they saw his vision as organism against himself. The employees didnt believe in the vision and were befuddled with all the changes. They were not involved in the change process and never had the vocalise when it came to feedback.Was he able to implement?No, he couldnt implement anything because his leadership style was the Pseudo-transformational leadership which is an inspired leadership that is self-serving, unwilling to push independent ideas from followers and exhibits little apprehension for others. This type of leadership has strong inspirational talent and appeal but is artful and dominates and directs followers towards his or her own values ( saviourie, Barling, et., al.,2011). This leadership also threaten the benefit of followers because it ignores the common good.How effective was Harold as a change agent and hearty architect for HTE?Harold at the set outning was very determined, but as time went by his vision seems to be uncertain. A smear vision which causes an overall effect of the shakeup was a precipitous drop in the worker morale an d production. Harold wasnt effective as a change agent because, in my opinion, I realize that Harold could not root word strong with his vision and mission. He could not influence the workers to follow his method.\r\nThis made the employees come up instability, as they also started to find it very difficult to support the companys vision. He confront a failure of having gained the employees trust. There wasnt a good race between Harold and the employees. Their lyric poem were neglected by him, resulting in a huge gap between the leader and the employees. Harold couldnt be considered as a social architect for HTE, because he did nothing that brought collateral change to the company. Instead, he destroys the valued organizational history of the company, its revenues and lost the morale amongst the employees.\r\nWhat Would you advise Harold to do differently if he had the outlook to return as president of HTE? I would advise him to humble himself and ask for comity from all his senior and lower managers and begin developing a new relationship by communicating effectively with everyone and cerebrate on workers affairs and calming crowing feelings, lifting spirits, and providing updates and progress reports as activities come. Then a new vision should be created that incorporates the unavoidably of the company as well as feedback from the leadership.\r\nFrom a Bible standpoint and perspective, I will like to be a kind of leader that is unselfish, and not solely concerned about my interest rather the interest of others as well and to lead my organization for the common good of all.\r\nIn our quest for the marks of mature spiritualty and leadership ability, we must not short that quality which so completely characterized the living of savior Christ, the quality of unselfish servanthood. deliverer said, ââ¬Å"For even the Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve, and to pee-pee his life a ransom for manyââ¬Â (Mark 10:45) The apostle Paul a dded to this focus when he wrote, ââ¬Å"Each of you should be concerned not only about your own interests, but the interests of others as wellââ¬Â (Phil. 1:4). further then pointing to the Savior as our great example, he quickly added, ââ¬Å"You should have the homogeneous attitude toward one another that Christ Jesus had.ââ¬Â\r\nIn conclusion, our leadership style as a believer in God Almighty should be present after our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Seeking not only our interest as leaders but for others as well and to also practice transformational leadership which is used in improving police squad development, (Bass ; Avolio,1994). Decision-making groups, quality initiative, and reorganizations.\r\nReferencesBass. M., ; Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational durability through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Bass, B. M., ; Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Christie, A., Barling., ; Turner, N. (2011). Pseudo-transformational leadership: Model judicial admission and outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,44(12), 2943- 2984Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication\r\n'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment