Aubrey Beardsley and Oscar Wilde :: Salome Plays Essays

Aubrey Beardsley and Oscar WildeOscar Wilde claimed to have discovered Aubrey Beardsley, when he asked him to illustrate his Salome. However, many flock have claimed the same thing. Author Robert Ross on the other hand, thinks that Beardsley really started with the workforce with whom his work will always be associated. The men he worked with on the Yellow Book. (Aubrey Beardsley, p.14). Aubrey was born on the twenty-first of August 1872, in Brighton England. He was a quiet reserved child of an upper middle mark family. He showed as a child rattling little make do for his lessons. However, he always showed an aptitude for drawing. Beardsleys father through very unfortunate circumstances lost his inherited fortune. Beardsley at this time suffered from terabit this was what eventually caused his death. His mother also became ill and was unable to take care of both him and his sister. Therefore, they were sent off to live with an old aunt. Their lives there was alone(p) and Aubr ey developed a taste for reading as well as drawing. His aunt placed him in a boarding school where he indulged in his talent by drawing caricatures of his teachers. In July 1888 he remaining the school and started working in an architects office. Beardsley wanted to go far the art world. He accomplished this in an incident, which became famous. It occurred when he was invited to see the studio of painter Sir Edward Burne-Jones. The artist was impressed by the drawings in Beardsleys portfolio, and recommended that he attend night classes at the Westminster School Of Art. This was the only formal development Beardsley had ever had.Ian Fletcher germ of Aubrey Beardsley by Ian Fletcher claims that Beardsley is not an impressionist, nor an expressionist, but essentially eclectic. He had no facility, no admiration for nature-pantheism, the superstition of the cultivated classes. (Aubrey Beardsley by Ian Fletcher, p.23). a great deal of Beardsleys work does connect directly with li terary texts. Beardsley is indeed a good deal concerned with the reader or viewer, but hardly in the minuscule facilitating mode of the average illustrator and reader is the precise word. Yet, he does mediate surrounded by author and reader, not conducting word into image, but bringing to light sooner what implicit, forbidden, or subversive elements of a text so disconcerting the author and forcing the reader to become a voyeur by recognizing in himself what he condemns in others.